MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940534004 · doi:10.36568/kesling.v16i3.896

FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KELELAHAN (Studi Pada Pekerja Proyek Kapal Perang di PT. X Tahun 2018)

2018· article· id· W2940534004 on OpenAlexaff
Nindia Nuraini, Winarko, SB Eko Warno

Bibliographic record

VenueGEMA Lingkungan Kesehatan · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Management
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesGynecologyMedicineArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kelelahan merupakan masalah yang harus mendapat perhatian dalam suatu industri. Ada banyak faktor yang dapat berpotensi menimbulkan kelelahan. Faktor tersebut antara lain faktor individu seperti usia, lama kerja, kebiasaan merokok, kebiasaan tidur dan faktor lingkungan seperti iklim kerja dan kebisingan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kelelahan kerja pada pekerja yang bekerja di divisi Akomodasi, Deck Tank dan Deck Whool di proyek kapal perang PT. X tahun 2018.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik observasional dengan desain Cross Sectional. Teknik pengambilan sampel adalah sampel acak sederhana pada 50 pekerja. dengan jumlah sampel (n = 44) dari populasi (N = 50). Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan kuesioner, observasi menggunakan checklist, pengukuran WGBT dan pengukuran intensitas kebisingan. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan univariat dan bivariat menggunakan Fisher Exact Test.Dari analisis statistik, kelelahan kerja kerja secara signifikan dipengaruhi oleh usia, perokok, kebiasaan tidur (p ≤ 0,05) dan tidak dipengaruhi oleh tiga variabel lainnya antara lain iklim kerja, kebisingan lama kerja ≤ 8 jam / hari (p> 0,05).Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini perusahaan disarankan untuk memberikan pelatihan tentang kelelahan kepada semua pekerja dan melakukan kegiatan olahraga secara teratur. Pekerja disarankan untuk istirahat tidur yang cukup (7-8 jam/hari). Untuk mencegah kelelahan di lain waktu. Kata kunci: kelelahan, faktor individu, faktor lingkungan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGEMA Lingkungan KesehatanSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ManagementFrench-language works237,207