MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940573396

Application of Low Pressure Reverse Osmosis Membranes for the treatment of UASB effluent

2019· dissertation· en· W2940573396 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peter Innes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsReverse osmosisEffluentMembranePressure-retarded osmosisOsmosisOsmotic powerEnvironmental scienceWaste managementForward osmosisEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringPetroleum engineeringProcess engineeringChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research was completed on the performance of low energy reverse osmosis membranes for the treatment of Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bioreactor (UASB) effluent with the goal of water reuse. The parameters studied were included the flux profile, constituent rejection, and membrane resistance changes. An investigation into the effectiveness of pre-treatment by GAC column and a study of fouling characteristics was also completed. Wastewater was taken from an industrial partner who operated an industrial scale UASB used to treat is brewery effluent. The studied RO membranes showed between 94-96% COD rejection, 93-96% TP rejection, and 68-80% TN rejection. The effluent quality met the reused guidelines put forth by the US EPA, however limits found in case studies suggest that the effluent quality is high in both salinity and COD. A GAC column was found to improve the flux and rejection of all membranes. Calcium was identified as the main inorganic foulant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)Same topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207