MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940666545

Alteration and Cu-Zn mineralization of the turgeon volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit (New Brunswick, Canada)

2014· article· en· W2940666545 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erik Lalonde

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralization (soil science)GeologyGeochemistrySulfideMineralogyMetallurgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le gîte Turgeon est un sulfure massif volcanogène (SMV) riche en Cu-Zn, encaissé dans les roches volcano-sédimentaires ordoviciennes du Groupe de Fournier dans la Boutonnière Elmtree-Belledune, au Nouveau-Brunswick (Canada). Le Groupe de Fournier comprend les formations Devereaux et Pointe Verte, qui sont tous les deux composées de gabbros et de basaltes cousinés. Le gîte Turgeon est composé de deux lentilles de sulfures massifs Cu-Zn avec des stockwerks chalcopyrite-pyrite sous-jacents aux deux lentilles. La géochimie indique que les roches encaissantes sont des basaltes et des andésites d’affinité tholéiitique de type MORB. Les roches encaissantes proximales aux lentilles de sulfures massifs sont composées de chlorite + quartz dans les zones stockwerks, tandis que les zones adjacentes aux lentilles de sulfures massifs sont altérées en calcite + sidérite + pyrite + talc. Les sulfures à Turgeon ont une valeur δ34S moyenne de 6.9 ‰ (5.8 – 10‰), indiquant que le soufre est principalement dérivé de la réduction thermochimique de sulfate d’eau de mer ordovicienne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.153
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207