Challenges and Recommended Policies for Simultaneous Global Implementation of Low-GWP Refrigerants and High Efficiency in Room Air Conditioners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing incomes, electrification, and urbanization—as well as a warming world—are driving up the global stock of air conditioners (ACs), particularly in emerging economies with hot climates. AC energy consumption is expected to increase substantially as the global stock of room ACs rises to 1.5 billion in 2030 and 2.5 billion in 2050. Hence, improving AC energy efficiency will be critical to reducing AC energy, cost (consumer lifecycle cost, electricity generation cost, etc.), peak load, and emissions impacts. The 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol offers an opportunity to improve AC energy efficiency in tandem with the phasedown of high global warming potential (GWP) hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants. Based on the most recent information, a literature review, and interviews with manufacturers and industry experts, we find the main barriers to deploying high-efficiency ACs include concerns about market demand and cost, which could be mitigated by appropriately improved design of market-transformation programs such as standards and labeling, incentive, and procurement programs. The main barriers to the low-GWP refrigerant transition include the need for timely revision of safety standards and associated costs for capacity-building activities allowing safe use of low-GWP refrigerants in ACs. Policy action and the market transformation can be accelerated by advancing the refrigerant transition and efficiency improvements in parallel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".