Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta publicacion ha sido posible gracias, en primer lugar, a la colaboracion del Museo Romano Oiasso, de San Telmo Museoa, de la Universitat de Barcelona, de la Universite Toulouse III, de la Universite Lyon 2, de ICOM-Espana y del Ecomuseu de les Valls d’Aneu. Y, en segundo lugar, a los apoyos economicos de las siguientes instituciones: el Vicerrectorado del Campus de Gipuzkoa de la UPV/EHU; la Fundacion Canada; el Departamento de Educacion del Gobierno Vasco; y el Departamento de Cultura, Turismo, Juventud y Deportes de la Diputacion Foral de Gipuzkoa. Por ultimo, este libro se ha llevado a cabo en el marco del grupo investigacion El patrimonio cultural y natural en tiempos de crisis. Retos, adaptaciones y estrategias en contextos locales (CSO2015-68611-R) financiado por el Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, y del Grupo de Investigacion en Patrimonio Construido (IT890-16) del Sistema Universitario Vasco.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".