MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2940935226

Evaluation of perennial cereal rye longevity and forage production when harvested at different stages of maturities and under grazing

2007· article· en· W2940935226 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. D. Iwaasa, Jessica McLeod, R. B. Muri, E. Birkedal, SN Acharya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaScheme for Promotion of Academic and Research CollaborationMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsGrazingForageLongevityPerennial plantAgronomyBiologyProduction (economics)Fodder
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perennial Cereal Rye (PC rye) (Secale cereale) has been promoted as a highly productive perennial forage crop for hay/silage and grazing for dryland areas. However \nearlier research done at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada – Semiarid Prairie Agricultural Research Centre (AAFC-SPARC) have found that time of seeding and \ndefoliation on PC rye can greatly affect the number of plants surviving through the \nwinter. Current research at AAFC-SPARC indicated that the stage of harvest (preboot, \nboot and flowering) does affect stand survival and that PC rye longevity is lower \n(P<0.001) than other short lived forage species, such as, Dahurian wildrye and Slender \nwheatgrass under irrigation or dryland. Grazing studies at AAFC-SPARC also observed \nPC rye plant counts decline by over 48% after two years of moderate grazing at the boot to heading plant stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management→French-language works237,207→