MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940936584

SIMULASI ANTRIAN PELAYANAN PADA GARDU TOL BINJAI

2019· article· en· W2940936584 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Transport Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTollTransport engineeringService (business)Computer scienceEngineeringBusinessMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Services performed by service providers must be maximized, so that customers get satisfaction in receiving services. The thing that affects service maximally is the limited available resources, so more research is needed about the queuing system that has gone so far. Binjai City already has a toll road and has been operating since 2018, so far the use of toll roads is still running smoothly, but it should be noted whether this toll road has been operating optimally or not optimally. Toll roads are an important part of the transportation system, toll roads not only function as a good choice to avoid traffic congestion, but also affect all traffic conditions for the metropolitan area. Congestion is currently not a priority issue on the Binjai-Medan toll road. From the results of the research conducted, information is obtained that the number of toll gates is still appropriate, namely 3 Substations, Probability of busy Substation = <1 means that for now the Toll Gate will not be long queues at the time of normal everyday conditions, and further analysis is needed in the following years, so that the possibility of a Toll Station can always be maximized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4120.816

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it