MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2940939672 · doi:10.1121/1.5101235

Live color encoded speckle imaging platform for real-time complex flow visualization <i>in vivo</i>

2019· article· en· W2940939672 on OpenAlexaff
Billy Y. S. Yiu, Mateusz Walczak, Marcin Lewandowski, Alfred C. H. Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSpeckle patternFrame rateComputer visionRendering (computer graphics)Artificial intelligenceVisualizationTemporal resolutionOptical flowPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex flow patterns carry valuable diagnostic information but they cannot be visualized in a time-resolved and intuitive manner in real-time. In this work, we present the first real-time scanning platform for a high frame rate ultrasound technique called color encoded speckle imaging (CESI) and its use in visualizing blood flow dynamics in vivo. CESI visualizes these dynamics through duplex rendering of flow speckle motion and color-coded Doppler velocity estimates. Its live implementation was achieved by integrating a 192-channel programmable ultrasound front-end module, a 5 GB/s capacity data streaming link, and a series of computing kernels implemented on the graphical processing unit (GPU) for beamforming, Doppler processing and display rendering. A slow-motion replay mode was also included to offer coherent visualization of CESI frames acquired at sub-millisecond resolution (0.3 ms). The live CESI scanning platform was found to be effective in facilitating real-time image guidance (>20 fps). In vivo pilot trials also showed that live CESI, when operating in replay mode, can temporally resolve the formation and dissipation of recirculation at the carotid bifurcation and can reveal flow dynamics in the brachial vein during a fist-clenching maneuver. Overall, live CESI has potential for use in routine in vivo investigations that seek to identify complex flow dynamics in real-time and relate these dynamics to vascular pathophysiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→