MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940939711 · doi:10.1080/02670836.2019.1596369

Critical Assessment 32: Controling the melting behaviour of cast structures through solid-state deformation

2019· article· en· W2940939711 on OpenAlex
Frank Czerwiński

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEquiaxed crystalsSolidusThixotropyDeformation (meteorology)LiquidusSlurryComposite materialMetallurgySolid-stateGrain boundaryCastingMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of solid-state deformation of cast structures in controlling the morphological transformations, accompanying their subsequent melting is critically assessed. When dendritic morphologies, present after casting, are subjected to solid-state deformation with a strain level sufficient to trigger recrystallisation, they are replaced by equiaxed grain structures. Heating of such structures to temperatures of the solidus-liquidus range initiates melting at triple junctions and along grain boundaries, causing disappearance of dendrites, which are replaced by globular features. The semisolid slurry formed this way exhibits thixotropic properties, positively affecting its flow behaviour and properties after solidification. Although a variety of conventional and exotic deformation techniques generate very fine grain structure after recrystallisation, it does not lead to substantial differences in morphological characteristics of the semisolid slurry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it