MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940943335 · doi:10.29105/rinn2.4-4

Un Estudio Analítico de la Relación entre los Negocios Internacionales y el Desarrollo Sustentable en el Contexto de los Tratados de Libre Comercio: la Experiencia Práctica

2017· article· es· W2940943335 on OpenAlex
German Torregrosa Contreras

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Innovaciones de Negocios · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceContext (archaeology)GeographyHumanitiesCartographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palabras Clave: Negocios internacionales, desarrollo sustentable, tratados de libre comercio, administración ambiental.Resumen. El presente estudio busca analizar en profundidad las relaciones que se generan entre los negocios internacionales y el desarrollo sustentable, dentro del contexto de los tratados de libre comercio suscritos por México con Estados Unidos y Canadá, por México con Chile y por Chile con Estados Unidos. Se efectúa un estudio analítico de las normas relativas a desarrollo sustentable contenidas en los tratados, se reconocen diferencias y semejanzas entre ellas, y se investiga sobre la aplicación de la normatividad en la práctica. Se propone el uso masivo de 16 Principios para el logro de una sólida administración ambiental en los negocios internacionales; se determina que en algunos casos los negocios internacionales favorecen al desarrollo sustentable, y que en otros, lo perjudican; y, finalmente, se reconoce la importancia de introducir el estudio del desarrollo sustentable en el sistema educativo general, como una manera de avanzar hacia el fin de la disociación actual existente entre empresa y desarrollo sustentable.Key words: International business, sustainable development, free trade agreements, environmental management.Abstract. This work looks into the relations generated between international business and sustainable development, in the context of the free trade agreements signed by Mexico, United States and Canada, by Mexico and Chile, and by Chile and United States. An analytical study of the norms related to sustainable development contained in the agreements is done; similarities and differences are recognized between those norms; and the application of the normative is studied. The massive use of 16 Principles for the achievement of solid environmental management in international business is proposed; it’s determined that in some cases international business are favorable to sustainable development and in other cases are harmful; and, finally, the importance of introducing the study of sustainable development to the general educational system is recognized, as an advance towards ending the actual dissociation existing between companies and sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it