MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941008820 · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-951-5-75

Data for Adherence Decision Support

2019· article· en· W2941008820 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Diemert, Jens Weber, Morgan Price, Jordan Bannman

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in health technology and informatics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedication Adherence and Compliance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of VictoriaCritical Systems Labs
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecision support systemMeasure (data warehouse)Computer sciencePsychological interventionScale (ratio)The InternetData scienceMedicineData miningWorld Wide WebNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technological interventions aimed at addressing medication non-adherence have shown some promise but do not deliver the full potential of an Internet of Things based Adherence Decision Support (ADS) system due, in part, to a lack high-resolution definition and measure of adherence. This paper presents a novel methodology and pilot study aimed at collecting data to support an AI-based measure of adherence. The pilot study results demonstrate the viability of the methodology and that a full-scale study could provide meaningful data to support to an AI-based ADS system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in health technology and informaticsSame topicMedication Adherence and ComplianceFrench-language works237,207