MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MP43-01 PHASE 2 KEYNOTE-057 STUDY: PEMBROLIZUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK NON–MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER UNRESPONSIVE TO BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN

2019· article· en· W2941023559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Girish S. Kulkarini, Ronald de Wit, Arjun Vasant Balar, Ashish M. Kamat, Edward Uchio, Loı̈c Mourey, Laurence E. Krieger, Eric A. Singer, Dean F. Bajorin, Petros Grivas, Ho Kyung Seo, Hiroyuku Nishiyama, Badarinath Konety, Kijoeng Nam, Ekta Kapadia, Tara L. Frenkl, Joost L. Boormans

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabBladder cancerCancerPsychoanalysisInternal medicinePsychologyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Non-invasive III (MP43)1 Apr 2019MP43-01 PHASE 2 KEYNOTE-057 STUDY: PEMBROLIZUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH HIGH-RISK NON–MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER UNRESPONSIVE TO BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN Girish S. Kulkarini*, Ronald de Wit, Arjun V. Balar, Ashish Kamat, Edward Uchio, Loic Mourey, Laurence Krieger, Eric A. Singer, Dean Bajorin, Petros Grivas, Ho Kyung Seo, Hiroyuku Nishiyama, Badarinath Konety, Kijoeng Nam, Ekta Kapadia, Tara Frenkl, and Joost L. Boormans Girish S. Kulkarini*Girish S. Kulkarini* More articles by this author , Ronald de WitRonald de Wit More articles by this author , Arjun V. BalarArjun V. Balar More articles by this author , Ashish KamatAshish Kamat More articles by this author , Edward UchioEdward Uchio More articles by this author , Loic MoureyLoic Mourey More articles by this author , Laurence KriegerLaurence Krieger More articles by this author , Eric A. SingerEric A. Singer More articles by this author , Dean BajorinDean Bajorin More articles by this author , Petros GrivasPetros Grivas More articles by this author , Ho Kyung SeoHo Kyung Seo More articles by this author , Hiroyuku NishiyamaHiroyuku Nishiyama More articles by this author , Badarinath KonetyBadarinath Konety More articles by this author , Kijoeng NamKijoeng Nam More articles by this author , Ekta KapadiaEkta Kapadia More articles by this author , Tara FrenklTara Frenkl More articles by this author , and Joost L. BoormansJoost L. Boormans More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000556224.50163.adAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Most patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who receive standard-of-care TURBT and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) experience recurrence. For BCG-unresponsive disease, radical cystectomy is the standard treatment option, though it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Upregulation of the PD-1 pathway has been observed in BCG-resistant NMIBC, suggesting that patients who receive PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may benefit. Efficacy and safety of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab as monotherapy in patients with high-risk (HR), BCG-unresponsive NMIBC were evaluated in the single-arm phase 2 KEYNOTE-057 study (NCT02625961); results for patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumor (cohort A) are reported. METHODS: Patients were enrolled if they had histologically confirmed HR, BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary disease and were unable or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for 24 mo or until recurrence, progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with HR NMIBC or progressive disease during treatment were required to discontinue. The primary end point was complete response (CR) rate, and key secondary end points were duration of response and safety. RESULTS: 103 pts (median age 73 years; CIS alone 71.8%; median number of prior BCG instillations 12) enrolled in cohort A. With a median follow-up of 14.0 mo (range 4.0-26.3), the 3-mo CR rate was 38.8% (95% CI 29.4%-48.9%) by central assessment. Among patients who achieved CR at 3 mo, median CR duration had not been reached (range 0+ to 14.1+ mo). 80.2% of patients had a CR duration of at least 6 mo (Kaplan-Meier method). 10 (25.0%) experienced recurrent NMIBC after CR; at the time of analysis, none progressed to muscle-invasive or metastatic disease. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 65 (63.1%) patients. Most frequent treatment-related AEs were pruritus (10.7%), fatigue (9.7%), diarrhea (8.7%), hypothyroidism (5.8%), and maculopapular rash (5.8%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 13 (12.6%) patients. 6 patients (5.8%) discontinued due to a treatment-related AE. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab monotherapy had encouraging activity and a promising duration of response in patients with HR, BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary tumors. The safety profile was consistent with that of previous experience. Updated data using additional follow-up will be presented. Source of Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. Toronto, Canada; Rotterdam, Netherlands; New York, NY; Houston, TX; Orange, CA; Toulouse, France; St. Leonards, Australia; New Brunswick, NJ; New York, NY; Seattle, WA; Goyang, Korea, Republic of; Tsukuba, Japan; Minneapolis, MN; Kenilworth, NJ; Rotterdam, Netherlands© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 201Issue Supplement 4April 2019Page: e616-e616 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2019 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Girish S. Kulkarini* More articles by this author Ronald de Wit More articles by this author Arjun V. Balar More articles by this author Ashish Kamat More articles by this author Edward Uchio More articles by this author Loic Mourey More articles by this author Laurence Krieger More articles by this author Eric A. Singer More articles by this author Dean Bajorin More articles by this author Petros Grivas More articles by this author Ho Kyung Seo More articles by this author Hiroyuku Nishiyama More articles by this author Badarinath Konety More articles by this author Kijoeng Nam More articles by this author Ekta Kapadia More articles by this author Tara Frenkl More articles by this author Joost L. Boormans More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207