MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941030449

Evaluation of Efficacy of New and Existing Desiccants in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik)

2019· dissertation· en· W2941030449 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ethan Bertholet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDesiccantLens (geology)BiologyGeographyMeteorology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In western Canada, weeds resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors have created an extensive challenge for many lentil (Lens culinaris L.) producers, particularly producers growing imidazolinone (IMI) resistant lentil. These resistant weed biotypes may not always impact the yield of the current lentil crop, but the resulting seedbank additions and subsequent spread of these resistant biotypes can have a long-lasting impact in successive growing seasons. An effective weed seedbank management program is important to reduce the impact of problem weeds and is vital for farming operations to remain profitable and sustainable in future seasons. This 3-year study at Saskatoon and Scott, Saskatchewan (2012-2014) evaluated the impact of several pre-harvest herbicides on juncea canola (Brassica juncea L.) and kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) dry-down, weed seed production, and the viability and vigour of the weed seeds. The field study examined the effects of different contact herbicides, tank mixed with two different rates of glyphosate (450 g a.i. ha-1 and 900 g a.i. ha-1), on weed dry-down, weed seed production and the viability and vigour of developing weed seeds. Five contact herbicides were evaluated: pyraflufen, flumioxazin, saflufenacil, glufosinate, and diquat. Diquat (415 g a.i. g ha-1) and glufosinate (600 g a.i. ha-1) applied alone or tank mixed with glyphosate provided greater dry-down of kochia and juncea compared to flumioxazin, pyraflufen, and saflufenacil. No herbicide treatment was able to significantly reduce seed production of either weed species. Although several treatments reduced the thousand seed weight (TSW) of kochia, only a high rate of glyphosate was effective at reducing juncea TSW. Growth cabinet studies showed that glyphosate and glufosinate applied alone or in a tank mix together significantly reduced kochia seedling vigour. The number of viable juncea seeds was reduced significantly when glyphosate or diquat was applied alone. Overall, glyphosate applied alone was just as effective at reducing seed germination and seedling vigour as tank-mixes with diquat or glufosinate. However, a tank mix of glufosinate and glyphosate as a pre-harvest herbicide treatment in lentil would be the best option to delay the development of glyphosate resistance in kochia and wild mustard. This tank mix would also reduce the viability and vigour of kochia seed additions into the seedbank, as well as provide plant dry-down of lentil and weedy material prior to harvest. \n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207