MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941032192 · doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab1b87

Magnetic textures in a hexaferrite thin film and their response to magnetic fields revealed by phase microscopy

2019· article· en· W2941032192 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsMagnetic domainMagnetic force microscopeMagnetizationPermalloyTransmission electron microscopyMagnetic fieldThin filmPhase (matter)Demagnetizing field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigated magnetic textures in a Sc-doped hexaferrite film by means of phase microscopy with a hole-free phase plate in a transmission electron microscope. In a zero magnetic field, the stripe-shaped magnetic domains coexist with magnetic bubbles. The magnetization in both magnetic domains was oriented perpendicular to the film and the domain walls have an in-plane magnetization. In the remnant state at 9.2 mT, a number of magnetic bubbles were formed with the formation of stripe-shaped magnetic domains, and the out-of-plane component in the stripe-shaped domains gradually appeared as the film thickness increased. As the film thickness increased further, the magnetic bubbles with clockwise or counterclockwise spin helicities formed a triangular lattice. These results in the remnant state suggest that the domain-wall energy in the magnetic bubble domains is lower in the thicker region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it