MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941044879 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00442

Human Physiology During Exposure to the Cave Environment: A Systematic Review With Implications for Aerospace Medicine

2019· review· en· W2941044879 on OpenAlexaff
Lucrezia Zuccarelli, Letizia Galasso, Rachel Turner, Emily J. B. Coffey, Loredana Bessone, Giacomo Strapazzon

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaveSystematic reviewHuman researchHuman studiesIsolation (microbiology)Human physiologyMedicinePhysiologyPsychologyMEDLINEBioinformaticsBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Successful long-duration missions outside low-Earth orbit will depend on technical and physiological challenges under abnormal environmental conditions. Caves, characterized by absence of light, confinement, three-dimensional human movement and long-duration isolation, are identifiably one of the earliest examples of scientific enquiry into space analogues. However, little is known about the holistic human physiological response during cave exploration or prolonged habitation. The aim of our review was to conduct a systematic bibliographic research review of effects of short and prolonged exposure to cave environment on human physiology, with a view to extend the results to implications for human planetary exploration missions. Methods: A systematic search was conducted following the structured PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for electronic databases. Results: The search retrieved 1519 studies. There were 50 articles selected for further revision, of which 31 met our inclusion criteria. Cardiovascular, endocrine-metabolic, immunologic-haematological, muscular responses and visual dysfunction were investigated in short-term exposure cave studies. Prolonged exposure studies mainly investigated whether biological rhythms persist or desist in the absence of standard environmental conditions. Studies have shown a reasonable interference based on specific subterranean protocols already with short exposure. During underground cave isolation changes in circadian system frequency are demonstrated. Conclusions: This review facilitates further comparison with knowledge in related disciplines pertaining to human preparation in challenging environments, stimulates research, and offers an opportunity to utilise this overview to inform advanced study design and noteworthy research focus in future human space analogue research in subterranean environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.008
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207