Organizational Culture, Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Faculty in Private-Sectarian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explored the organizational culture, organizational commitment and job satisfaction of the faculty membersof the St. Paul University System (SPUS). This study employed a descriptive and correlational research design. Thedata gathered were analyzed and interpreted using frequency and percentage distribution to confirm statisticalassumptions and to describe the participants' profile in terms of the identified variables. The weighted mean was usedto interpret the responses obtained from the use of the Likert's scale. The regression analysis was used to determine thebest predictors of job satisfaction and organizational commitment while Pearson and Chi-Square were used todetermine the degree of relationship between the variables. The results of this study indicate that there is a significantpositive relationship between job satisfaction and organizational culture. It was also found out that job satisfactionpredicts organizational commitment. The results of this study will be a basis for the SPUS to strengthen theorganizational commitment and explore various ways to raise the level of job satisfaction of the faculty members of therespondent-institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it