MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941062936 · doi:10.13031/aea.12833

Technical Feasibility of Spraying <i>Trichogramma ostriniae</i> Pupae to Control the European Corn Borer in Sweet Corn Crops

2019· article· en· W2941062936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pascal Gauthier, Mohamed Khelifi, Ariane Dionne, Silvia Todorova

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Engineering in Agriculture · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSprayerPupaBiologyToxicologyPest controlPEST analysisEuropean corn borerIntegrated pest managementAgronomyHorticultureLarvaBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The European corn borer, (Hübner), is the major insect pest of sweet corn in the province of Quebec, Canada, and around the world. The presence of this pest results in substantial yield decreases and profit losses for farmers. Currently, chemical insecticides are the main method used to control this insect pest. Nevertheless, there are some interesting alternatives to chemicals for controlling the European corn borer, in particular the use of predator insects. Many research studies demonstrated the effectiveness of using wasps to successfully control the corn borer. However, this biocontrol method is more expensive and complex than chemical insecticides. The main objective of this research study was to investigate the technical feasibility of spraying pupae to facilitate the implementation of this method and reduce operating costs. For this purpose, many experimental trials using were carried out in the laboratory, with the objective of finding a suitable aqueous solution that both disperses the pupae in the sprayer tank and causes them to adhere to corn leaves once sprayed. A laboratory-scale spraying system was also designed and built to check the viability of T pupae after immersion in the spray solution and spraying. The viability of pupae was investigated further using a field prototype boom sprayer. The results showed that it is possible to spray pupae while preserving their physical integrity. In addition, a mixture of guar gum and xanthan gum was found to be the most suitable for the adhesion of pupae to corn leaves. The system overall decreased the emergence rate of Trichogramma by 10% to 15% which is considered acceptable by the authors. The success of this spraying technique for controlling the European corn borer in corn crops is highly valuable and could be generalized to other predator insects. Keywords: Biocontrol, Emergence rate, European corn borer, Spraying system, Sweet corn, Trichogramma ostriniae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Engineering in AgricultureSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207