MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941104801 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2019.2913510

Modified Explicit Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for Nonparaxial Wave Scattering From Electromagnetic Metasurfaces

2019· article· en· W2941104801 on OpenAlexaff
Scott A. Stewart, Sanam Moslemi-Tabrizi, T. Smy, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodPhysicsReflection (computer programming)ScatteringDiffractionOpticsElectromagnetic radiationGratingFinite difference methodTransmission (telecommunications)Maxwell's equationsGridDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical analysisComputer scienceClassical mechanicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An updated method for simulating the scattered fields from a dispersive Huygens' metasurface using the explicit finite-difference time-domain technique has been proposed and numerically demonstrated. The method uses a spatial-temporal averaging of the electric and magnetic fields, using virtual sources in a standard Yee cell grid. This creates a nonparaxial implementation of the generalized sheet transition conditions in the time domain and rigorously solves the scattered fields in reflection and transmission regions separately. The metasurfaces are solved for Lorentzian susceptibilities, and the proposed method is successfully demonstrated using two examples: a uniform metasurface with a strongly divergent beam and a space-modulated metasurface emulating a diffraction grating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207