MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941128776 · doi:10.21037/amj.2019.04.03

The Science and Art of Medicine at McGill University

2019· article· en· W2941128776 on OpenAlexaffabout
David H. Eidelman

Bibliographic record

VenueAME Medical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityEndowmentImmigrationMedicineMedical schoolMedical scienceGerontologyLibrary scienceMedical educationEconomic growthGeographyPolitical scienceArchaeologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Almost 200 years ago, a general hospital and a medical school were established with the goal of addressing the needs of the growing community of immigrants who came to Montreal in search of prosperity in furs and timber. Within a few years, the school became the Faculty of Medicine of the newly created McGill University, named for the fur trader who gave the land and the initial endowment to establish it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAME Medical JournalSame topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207