MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941143981

Playing the third quarter: sport, memory and silences in Aboriginal memoirs

2019· article· en· W2941143981 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gary Osmond

Bibliographic record

VenueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousQuarter (Canadian coin)MemoirPublishingProject commissioningRacismSociologyMedia studiesGovernment (linguistics)Gender studiesHuman settlementHistoryPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper surveys 57 published autobiographies, biographies, interviews and ‘as told to’ accounts by Aboriginal Queenslanders from Cherbourg, Palm Island, Woorabinda and Yarrabah — former government Aboriginal settlements and missions — for insights into the sporting past. Premised on the importance of sport to Aboriginal people, and in recognition of deep sporting engagement historically, it seeks to explore and analyse the complex relationship of people with sport, which includes, but exceeds, racism and victimhood. It conceives sport as a game with four quarters: the first largely hidden; the second marked by exposure of racist, oppressive and discriminatory practices that occurred in the first quarter; the third embracing life writings by Aboriginal people; and the fourth involving increasing collaboration between Indigenous and non-Indigenous historians in understanding the sporting past. This paper focuses on the third quarter in an attempt to enrich those understandings via an expanded range of voices, stories and perspectives contained in published memories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0240.028
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQueensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)Same topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207