Quantum many-body conformal dynamics: Symmetries, geometry, conformal tower states, and entropy production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article we study the quench dynamics of Galilean and scale-invariant many-body systems which can be prepared using interacting atomic gases. The far-from-equilibrium dynamics is investigated by employing $m$-body density matrices, which are most conveniently defined in terms of a special basis, the conformal tower states. We explicitly illustrate that, although during the initial stage of the dynamics all symmetries can be broken and absent in the unitary evolution because of the initialization of the state, there is always an emergent conformal symmetry in the long-time limit. The emergence of this dynamic conformal symmetry is robust and always occurs, even when scale and other symmetries (such as rotational symmetry) are still fully broken in the many-body states; it uniquely defines the characteristics of the asymptotic dynamics near a scale-invariant strong-coupling fixed point. As an immediate application of the asymptotic dynamics of the microscopic density matrices, we focus on the effects of this emergent conformal symmetry on two observables: the moment of inertia tensor ${I}_{ij}(t), i,j=x,y,z$, and the entropy density field $S(\mathbf{r},t)$ in the hydrodynamic flow of strongly interacting particles. We show that the long-time behavior of these observables is completely set by conformal symmetry, while the leading long-time corrections depend on interference effects between different conformal tower states. The emergent conformal symmetry naturally leads to entropy conservation and conformal cooling, an energy-conserving cooling of a strongly interacting gas during free expansion. When the interaction Hamiltonian breaks the scale symmetry, we further demonstrate that there is a direct cause-effect relation between conformal symmetry breaking in the long-time limit and a nonvanishing entropy production. This suggests that the entropy production rate is a natural parameter for categorizing the breaking of conformal symmetry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".