O social e o comum: neoliberalismo, biopolítica e renda universal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumo Diante da rarefação das possibilidades de expansão da proteção social no Brasil, especialmente a partir de 2016, o principal esteio para a luta política eficaz em matéria de direitos sociais consistiria aparentemente em reagir contra as reformas neoliberais do Estado brasileiro, restaurando os pilares do Welfare State e de sua lógica de workfare. A partir de um instrumento concreto - a renda universal - este artigo propõe deslocar o centro do debate na direção de uma pauta política positiva, lastreada no conceito de comum, superando os traços de condicionalidade e focalismo das políticas distributivas tradicionais. Cruzando análise de conjuntura e pesquisa bibliográfica, o tema é discutido previamente nos quadros teóricos da crítica biopolítica ao neoliberalismo (Lazzarato, Hardt e Negri, Dardot e Laval); descreve-se a renda universal como uma linha de ataque biopolítico apta a catalisar uma instituição do comum, encerrando uma alternativa ao dualismo mistificador entre neoliberalismo e welfarismo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".