MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2941275120 · doi:10.11575/prism/35684

Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds in Industrial, Coastal and Urban Regions

2018· dissertation· en· W2941275120 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Travis W. Tokarek

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryGeographyEnvironmental planningChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis describes the application of gas chromatography using direct air injection for the measurement and analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during three campaigns in unique environments (i.e., industrial, marine and urban). A Griffin 450 gas chromatograph equipped with a cylindrical ion trap mass spectrometer and electron impact ionization (GC-ITMS) and a Varian 3380CP equipped with an electron capture detector (GC-ECD) were used to acquire speciated measurements of select VOCs (monoterpenes, alkanes and aromatics) and peroxyacyl nitrates (PANs), respectively, which were analyzed to investigate air mass sources. In the first campaign, principal component analysis (PCA) was used on a dataset collected in the Alberta oil sands to elucidate possible sources of analytically unresolved intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs) that were observed in the GC-ITMS chromatograms. A spectrally similar analytically unresolved peak of IVOCs was observed in the lab from vapours in the headspace of a bitumen sample collected near the measurement site. In the second campaign, previously-reported nocturnal ozone-depletion events were investigated off the West coast of Vancouver Island. Monoterpenes and their oxidation products were measured to explore the role of biogenic VOCs (BVOC) as a possible chemical loss pathway for ozone in this region. The analysis showed that monoterpenes play a minor role in ozone depletion in this environment and that dry deposition is likely the dominant pathway. During this campaign, the headspace vapours of several local kelp species were measured to probe possible BVOC sources in the region. Limonene was found to be enhanced above background concentrations by two species (Nereocystis luetkeana and Alaria marginata) making them a previously unrecognized source of a highly reactive monoterpene in this environment. In the third campaign, two PAN species (i.e., peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) and peroxypropionic nitrate (PPN)) were measured by GC-ECD during a period when wildfire smoke was transported from California and British Columbia to Calgary, Alberta. The PPN/PAN ratio was calculated and ranged from 0.05 to 0.17 (a typical background value is 0.10) in biomass burning plumes. Gas chromatography with direct air injection continues to yield new and useful information and should be a component of any comprehensive analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→