MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941404034 · doi:10.3324/haematol.2018.214957

Novel insights into the genetics and epigenetics of MALT lymphoma unveiled by next generation sequencing analyses

2019· letter· en· W2941404034 on OpenAlex
Luciano Cascione, Andrea Rinaldi, Alessio Bruscaggin, Chiara Tarantelli, Alberto J. Arribas, Ivo Kwee, Lorenza Pecciarini, Afua A. Mensah, Valeria Spina, Elaine Y. Chung, Lodovico Terzi di Bergamo, Stephan Dirnhofer, Alexandar Tzankov, Roberto N. Miranda, Ken H. Young, Alexandra Traverse‐Glehen, Gianluca Gaïdano, Steven H. Swerdlow, Randy D. Gascoyne, Raúl Rabadán, Maurilio Ponzoni, Govind Bhagat, Davide Rossi, Emanuele Zucca, Francesco Bertoni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHaematologica · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsEpigeneticsGeneticsBiologyDNA sequencingComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International audience

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.205
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it