MP04-09 PREDICTORS OF SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS AND EVALUATION OF OUTCOMES AFTER SURGICAL CORRECTION OF ADULT ACQUIRED BURIED PENIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
single-use device is ready-to-use whenever needed without delay avoiding the wait for specialist instruments or equipment.METHODS: We evaluated the usefulness of the (UCDÒ) in our GURS-patient cohort when problematic catheterization in complex lower urinary tract (LUT) reconstruction was encountered and standard Foley-catheterization was not feasible and recorded any adverse events related to intra-operative UCD-catheterization.We recorded how often we used the device and how fast the catheterization difficulty was resolved.RESULTS: 16 men with failed standard Foley-catheterization after various complex LUT-GURS were catheterized with the (UCDÒ) without adverse events.In 15 of 16 (94%) UCD-catheterization was successful first-pass.In 1 of 16 (6%) the UCD-guidewire first turned, but the second insertion attempt was successful and no cystoscopic catheterization was necessary.In addition, one patient could receive bladder irrigation using the (UCDÒ).Managing problematic intraoperative urethral catheterization with the UCDÒ was time efficient resolving the problem in <5min in 94% of cases, excluding the time it took to collect the sterile consumable from the storeroom.CONCLUSIONS: The UCDÒ is a useful catheter device solving problematic urethral catheterization in complex GURS avoiding extra theatre time with patient care delay and potential risk of urethral catheterisation injury and traumatic damage to the complex LUT reconstruction.The UCDÒ is cost effective and time efficient providing safe patient care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".