MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941510530 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz036.057

DIPG-36. CLINICAL, RADIOLOGICAL, AND HISTO-MOLECULAR CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA IN PATIENTS WHO SURVIVE LESS THAN 3 MONTHS FROM DIAGNOSIS: A REPORT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY

2019· article· en· W2941510530 on OpenAlexaff
Nathan Dahl, Adam Lane, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Jane E. Minturn, Andrew Dodgshun, Sara Parkin, Chie‐Schin Shih, Tim Hassall, Jordan R. Hansford, Yvan Samson, Linbo Cai, Sarah Leary, Jie Ma, Ute Bartels, Cynthia Hawkins, Michelle Monje-Diesseroth, Paul G. Fisher, Karen Tsui, David S. Ziegler, Mariko DeWire‐Schottmiller, Brooklyn Chaney, Katie Black, Renee Doughman, James Leach, Blaise V. Jones, Christine Fuller, Maryam Fouladi, Lindsey M. Hoffman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGliomaStereotactic biopsyBiopsyRadiation therapyChemotherapyRadiologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is aggressive brainstem tumor with median survival of < 1 year. We queried data from the International DIPG Registry to define clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular characteristics of DIPG patients who survived < 3 months from diagnosis. Among 909 patients enrolled on the registry, 59 (6.5%) had overall survival (OS) of < 3 months. Median age at diagnosis was 5.8 years (range 0–13 years), and 12 (20%) were age < 3 years at diagnosis. Most presented with short duration of symptoms (< 6 weeks, 50/58; 86%) and at least one cranial nerve palsy, cerebellar sign, and/or pyramidal tract sign (52/54; 96%). Twenty-two (41%) presented with hydrocephalus, including 10 who required CSF diversion. All had extra-pontine extension on diagnostic imaging. Less than half of patients (25/56, 45%) received therapy; of these, 11 received radiation (RT) only, 12 received RT and chemotherapy, and 2 received chemotherapy only. Most received steroids (48/52; 92%), including 27 who received palliative steroids at the end of life. Biopsy and autopsy were performed in 11/57 (19%) and 13/58 (22%) cases, respectively. Of 22 for whom histology was known, 19 represented high-grade glioma subtypes, 2 low-grade gliomas, and 1 embryonal tumor. Six were molecularly characterized, and 3 harbored H3K27M mutations. Ongoing work will aim to further characterize the molecular features of these tumors with exceptional poor outcomes despite therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207