MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2941541324

PESQUISAS EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO NO BRASIL E NO CANADÁ

2009· other· pt· W2941541324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lídia Eugênia Cavalcante, Basma Makhlouf Shabou

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2009
Typeother
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Science and Libraries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPortuguesePolitical scienceGeographyArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este numero especial franco-portugues de Encontros Bibli e fruto da colaboracao entre pesquisadores em Ciencia da Informacao de escolas especializadas neste dominio no Brasil e no Canada. A co-organizacao e de responsabilidade de duas pesquisadoras da area. Do lado canadense, Basma Makhlouf (doutoranda da Escola de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao (EBSI), da Universidade de Montreal. Do lado brasileiro, por Lidia Eugenia Cavalcante, professora da Universidade Federal do Ceara (UFC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.579

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0110.026
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicInformation Science and Libraries→French-language works237,207→