MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941545382 · doi:10.1017/s0032247412000733

POLAR BEARS IN NORTHWEST GREENLAND: AN INTERVIEW SURVEY ABOUT THE CATCH AND THE CLIMATE. Eric W. Born, Anna Heilman, Lene Kielsen Holm and Kristin L. Laidre. 2011. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. 232 p, illustrated, hard cover. ISBN 978-87-635-3168-9. £47.49

2012· article· en· W2941545382 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew E. Derocher

Bibliographic record

VenuePolar Record · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)GeographyPhysical geographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POLAR BEARS IN NORTHWEST GREENLAND: AN INTERVIEW SURVEY ABOUT THE CATCH AND THE CLIMATE. Eric W. Born, Anna Heilman, Lene Kielsen Holm and Kristin L. Laidre. 2011. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. 232 p, illustrated, hard cover. ISBN 978-87-635-3168-9. £47.49 - Volume 49 Issue 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.232

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolar RecordSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207