MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941587500 · doi:10.4000/rfp.5415

THÉMINES Jean-François & DOUSSOT Sylvain. Acteurs et action. Perspectives en didactiques de l’histoire et de la géographie

2017· article· fr· W2941587500 on OpenAlexaff
Marc–André Éthier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de pédagogie · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jean-François Thémines et Sylvain Doussot, deux éminents didacticiens de la géographie et de l’histoire, ont codirigé un ouvrage collectif centré sur des observations empiriques denses, très informées par les didactiques françaises dans l’analyse des actions des différentes situations d’enseignement-apprentissage. L’ouvrage fait suite à un colloque, tenu à Caen en 2014, sur la place et le statut des acteurs dans les recherches menées dans les didactiques des disciplines des sciences sociales....

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française de pédagogieSame topicEducator Training and Historical PedagogyFrench-language works237,207