Accurate early prediction of tumour response to PDT using optical coherence angiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prediction of tumour treatment response may play a crucial role in therapy selection and optimization of its delivery parameters. Here we use optical coherence angiography (OCA) as a minimally-invasive, label-free, real-time bioimaging method to visualize normal and pathological perfused vessels and monitor treatment response following vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT). Preclinical results are reported in a convenient experimental model (CT-26 colon tumour inoculated in murine ear), enabling controlled PDT and post-treatment OCA monitoring. To accurately predict long-term treatment outcome, a robust and simple microvascular metric is proposed. It is based on perfused vessels density (PVD) at t = 24 hours post PDT, calculated for both tumour and peri-tumour regions. Histological validation in the examined experimental cohort (n = 31 animals) enabled further insight into the excellent predictive power of the derived early-response OCA microvascular metric. The results underscore the key role of peri-tumour microvasculature in determining the long-term PDT response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".