Jewish quarter in Medieval Lorca (south-eastern Spain)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article provides information about the Jewish community living in Alcalá, a district located within the defensive wall of one of the most important fortresses on the border with the Emirate of Granada (the last Muslim stronghold in the Iberian Peninsula). Before the beginning of the 21st century the existence of the Jewish community was known only from written sources. However, archaeological research which started in 2002 unearthed the exact location of the Jewish quarter. Systematic archaeological work made it possible to compile precise documentation related to the remains of residential buildings and a synagogue. Moveable historical artefacts discovered during field studies enriched the collection of the archaeological museum in Lorca and they are now a part of a permanent exhibition. As the result of these discoveries, Lorca was entered on the list of significant archaeological sites associated with the presence of Jews, along with places such as Toledo, Seville, Cordoba, Segovia and Ubeda. This article attempts to characterize the condition of archaeological tourism in Lorca and the possibilities of its development with regard to archaeological remains of the former Jewish quarter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".