Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'algbre de Kleene est la thorie algbrique des automates finis et des expressions rgulires.Rcemment, Kozen a propos un cadre de travail bas sur l'algbre de Kleene avec tests (une variante de l'algbre de Kleene) pour vrifier qu'un programme satisfait une politique de scurit spcifie par un automate de scurit.Malheureusement, cette approche ne permet pas de vrifier des proprits de vivacit pour les programmes ractifs (programmes qui s'excutent l'infini).Le but de ce mmoire est d'tendre la mthode de vrification de programmes propose par Kozen pour enlever cette limitation.Pour y arriver, nous dveloppons la thorie de l'omga-algbre (une extension de l'algbre de Kleene qui prend en compte les excutions infinies) qui constitue la majeure partie de ce mmoire.En particulier, nous prsentons des rsultats de compltude concernant la thorie de Horn de cette algbre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".