L'Evaluation des habiletes metacognitives chez des eleves du primaire plac;:es en situation de production de texte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our project is based upon recently expressed concerns, notably by the Quebec Superior Council of Education (1991a, 1991b, 1991c) that requests educators to place greater emphasis on the development of thinking tools which will prepare people to cope with a society which is caught up in increasing rapid technological and cultural change. It is now essential, not only to transmit knowledge which may quickly become obsolete, but also "ways of thinking" which will facilitate a more effective adaptation and better transfer of knowledge in situations which are more and more novel. In spite of these recommendations which prescribe educational programs which are based on the processes and competencies of learning, we note that most programs which are in place have a tendency to favor static models of knowledge. For our part, we favor an approach which emphasizes the "process of learning" rather than a simple transmission of knowledge. The themes of reflective thinking and of metacognition seem to reflect this approach to learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.042 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".