A Novel Orthogonal Direction Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Approach for SVM Hyperparameter Tuning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose the use of a black-box optimization method called deterministic Mesh Adaptive Direct Search (MADS) algorithm with orthogonal directions (Ortho-MADS) for the selection of hyperparameters of Support Vector Machines with a Gaussian kernel. Different from most of the methods in the literature that exploit the properties of the data or attempt to minimize the accuracy of a validation dataset over the first quadrant of (C, gamma), the Ortho-MADS provides convergence proof. We present the MADS, followed by the Ortho-MADS, the dynamic stopping criterion defined by the MADS mesh size and two different search strategies (Nelder-Mead and Variable Neighborhood Search) that contribute to a competitive convergence rate as well as a mechanism to escape from undesired local minima. We have investigated the practical selection of hyperparameters for the Support Vector Machine with a Gaussian kernel, i.e., properly choose the hyperparameters gamma (bandwidth) and C (trade-off) on several benchmark datasets. The experimental results have shown that the proposed approach for hyperparameter tuning consistently finds comparable or better solutions, when using a common configuration, than other methods. We have also evaluated the accuracy and the number of function evaluations of the Ortho-MADS with the Nelder-Mead search strategy and the Variable Neighborhood Search strategy using the mesh size as a stopping criterion, and we have achieved accuracy that no other method for hyperparameters optimization could reach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".