Analyse socio-sémiotique de l’événementialisation médiatique du conflit footballistique algéro-égyptien de 2009 : entre communication médiatique et mobilisation de l’actant collectif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compte tenu du traitement médiatique émotionnel des rencontres opposant l’Algérie à l’Égypte dans le cadre des éliminatoires jumelées de la CAN et du Mondial de 2010 et l’exercice politico-journalistique de tout ce qui relève d’une persuasion clandestine, une simple qualification à un tournoi de football s’est bien transformée en une sérieuse crise politico-sociale entre deux pays ayant longtemps vécu sous l’étendard de la fraternité. Dans le présent article, nous tâcherons à travers une approche socio-sémiotique, à comprendre le fonctionnement du processus médiatique qui, à des fins politiques, se sert du mythe du football (souvent chargé de valeurs identitaires et d’enjeux politiques) comme alibi pour imposer un ajustement de représentations et un basculement de l’opinion publique ainsi que des comportements collectifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".