MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941951647 · doi:10.1109/tim.2019.2910344

Statistical Evaluation of the Behavior of 5-GHz Radio LAN Devices

2019· article· en· W2941951647 on OpenAlexafffund
Ammar Alhosainy, Kareem M. Attiah, Ramy H. Gohary, Ioannis Lambadaris

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUniversal Software Radio PeripheralTestbedComputer scienceSoftware-defined radioBasebandWirelessComputer networkBandwidth (computing)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this paper is to develop an experimental hardware testbed for verifying the compliance of the medium access mechanism of commercially available Wi-Fi certified units with the IEEE 802.11 standard. The core of this testbed is based on a Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP), which is used to capture and downconvert the Wi-Fi frames to the baseband. The data captured by the USRP are used to extract the key medium access parameters of the commercial unit under test (UUT). Our measurement methodology involves a novel compliance metric based on the Kullback-Leibler distance between probability distributions. This metric is in the form of a single scalar, which will hence enable us to rank the UUTs based on their level of compliance. Furthermore, we develop a method based on the harmonized European Standard ETSI EN 301 893 to identify UUTs with noncompliant access mechanisms that tend to monopolize the wireless medium and UUTs for which compliance is an option that deviates from default settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207