MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942092166 · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000603

Transtubal Spread of a Superficially Invasive Cervical Adenocarcinoma to the Ovaries After 11 Years

2019· article· en· W2942092166 on OpenAlexaff
Alisa Abozina, Naveena Singh, Clelland Blake

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFallopian tubeAdenocarcinomaMedicinePathologyOvaryHysterectomyCervical cancerGynecologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a 55-yr-old woman who presented with bilateral ovarian masses, 11 yr after hysterectomy for superficially invasive stage IA1 cervical adenocarcinoma of usual (human papillomavirus-associated) type. The bilateral ovarian tumors were composed of glands lined by malignant mucinous epithelium and these tumors were metastases from her previous cervical adenocarcinoma, based on morphology, immunophenotype, and positive in situ hybridization for human papillomavirus. In addition, there was extensive involvement of the mucosa of the left fallopian tube by malignant mucinous epithelium. The patient is alive and well 2 yr after the ovarian recurrence. The phenomenon of minimally invasive cervical adenocarcinoma metastasizing to the ovary has been described previously; the extrauterine disease is typically limited to the ovaries and associated with a relatively favorable prognosis. The presence of fallopian tube involvement by cervical adenocarcinoma has rarely been reported, and suggests transtubal spread of tumor. Unique to this case is the >11 yr interval between diagnosis of the cervical and ovarian disease, with previously described cases showing up to a 7 yr latency period. This case demonstrates that spread of cervical adenocarcinoma to the ovaries, via the fallopian tube lumen, can occur after a very long latent period and this possibility must be considered when examining adnexal mass(es) in women who have previously had a hysterectomy for cervical adenocarcinoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207