An Ultrasound-Based Biomedical System for Continuous Cardiopulmonary Monitoring: A Single Sensor for Multiple Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomedical wearable sensors enable long-term monitoring applications and provide instantaneous diagnostic capabilities. Physiological monitoring can help in both the diagnosis and the ongoing treatment of a vast number of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases such as hypertension, dysrhythmia, and asthma. In this paper, we present a system capable of monitoring several vital signals and physiological variables that determine the cardiopulmonary activity status. We explore direct measurements of multiple vital parameters with only one sensor and without special constraints. The system employs a PZT-4 piezo transducer stimulated by a suitable analog front end. The system both generates pulsed ultrasound waves at 1 MHz and amplifies reflected echoes to track internal organ motions, mainly that of the heart apex. According to the respiratory motion of the heart, the proposed system provides respiratory and heart cycles information. Promising results were obtained from six subjects with an average accuracy of 96.7% in heartbeats per minute measurement, referenced to a commercial photoplethysmography sensor. It also exhibits 94.5% sensitivity and 94.0% specificity in respiration detection compared to a spirometer signal as a reference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".