MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942192133 · doi:10.22323/1.337.0027

SNO+: Current Results and Future Prospects

2019· article· en· W2942192133 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
E. J. Leming

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCompute CanadaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's UniversityCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNeutrinoScintillatorSolar neutrinoPhysicsNuclear physicsNeutrino detectorDouble beta decayMAJORANASolar neutrino problemSupernovaParticle physicsNeutrino oscillationDetectorAstrophysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SNO+ is a multipurpose neutrino experiment located approximately 2~km underground at SNOLAB, near Sudbury, Canada. The experiment takes a phased approach, transitioning through a water phase and an ultra-pure scintillator phase before loading the liquid scintillator with 0.5 \% natural Tellurium, which corresponds to approximately 1330 kg of $^{130}$Te. Water phase began in May 2017 resulting in a number of fundamental physics measurements including: a limit on invisible nucleon decay and a measurement of the $^{8}$Be solar neutrino flux. Scintillator fill began in November 2018 and Tellurium loading is planned for late 2019. During the loaded scintillator phase SNO+ will search for the neutrinoless double-beta decay of $^{130}$Te with an expected effective Majorana neutrino mass sensitivity which will probe the boundary of the inverted mass hierarchy. Additionally, SNO+ aims to measure reactor antineutrino oscillations, low-energy solar neutrinos, geo-neutrinos, to be sensitive to supernova neutrinos, and to search for exotic physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207