MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2942242363

Characterization of WssF; a putative acetyltransferase from Achromobacter insuavis and Pseudomonas fluorescens

2019· article· en· W2942242363 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cody Reese

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Glycomics NetworkNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPseudomonas fluorescensMicrobiologyBiologyAchromobacterPseudomonasBacteriaGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biofilms are a survival mechanism commonly employed by communities of bacteria for adherence and protection. Bacteria produce a matrix of polymers (e.g. exopolysaccharides, such as cellulose) that allow them to exert control on their local environment. In the case of cellulose biofilms, acetylation (addition of acetate on carbohydrates) is paramount for polymer integrity and in some cases virulence. For this research, the wrinkly spreader (WS) genotype of the emergent human pathogen Achromobacter insuavis facilitates infections of the eyes of contact lens wearers and the lungs of Cystic Fibrosis patients (CF). Chronic infections have created a growing concern for the protective role biofilms play in antimicrobial resistance. Cellulose biofilms are an important mechanism for other pathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescens, which affect produce and water sources by forming a robust cellulose-containing biofilm that enhances the ability of the bacteria to spread across surfaces. Both A. insuavis and P. fluorescens contain the wssF gene that encodes a putative O-acetyltransferase protein, in that site-specific mutagenesis of wssF resulted in non-acetylated cellulose. The purpose of this research was to characterize WssF from both species, to understand its role in the production of acetylated cellulose and investigate its role as a putative O-acetyltransferase protein. This research progressed successfully through three primary objectives; expression and purification of WssF, functional characterization of acetyltransferase activity and structural characterization of the WssF protein. Esterase activity, the first step in acetyl transfer, was successfully characterized through a kinetic workup, which found KM(2.88 – 7.18 mM), kcat (0.24 – 0.34 s-1) and, Vmax (47 – 83 s-1*M-1) values comparable to homologous acetyltransferases. Following this, acetyl transfer was confirmed through the use of Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) and Mass Spectrometry, both mono and diacetylated cellopentaose was produced in the presence of unmutated WssF. Site Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) of the predicted catalytic triad residues (Ser, Asp and, His) resulted in up to 85% inhibition of esterase activity and at least 95% of acetyl transfer thereby confirming their role in catalysis. Successful functional characterization of WssF has allowed for screening of potential enzyme inhibitors by High Throughput Screening (HTS) assays. A set of 18 compounds has been selected for further study as potential WssF acetyltransferase inhibitors. Finally, structural characterization of WssF has been advanced, with optimal conditions for crystallization having been determined and (~2Å) data sets collected but solving a structural model of WssF is ongoing. The findings of this research successfully outline the functional and structural characteristics of WssF, which are the first for a cellulose acetyltransferase involved in biofilm formation. This thesis further develops our understanding of biofilm modification, a vital step in combating antimicrobial resistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→