Bibliographic record
Abstract
La thématique des chantiers royaux constitue un élément récurrent des biographies consacrées à Saint Louis. Elle est présente dès la première Vita, écrite quelques années après la mort de Louis IX par son confesseur, le dominicain Geoffroy de Beaulieu, et se trouve ensuite régulièrement enrichie. Néanmoins, l’éclairage ainsi apporté sur la commande architecturale du roi laisse dans l’ombre certains aspects de celle-ci : les auteurs ne s’intéressent guère à la matérialité monumentale de ces édifices, et ils passent sous silence une partie des chantiers financés par le souverain. L’étude des « Vies de Saint Louis » permet ainsi de mesurer l’écart qui peut exister entre la réalité de la commande royale et l’image qu’en ont retenu les écrivains du XIIIe et du XIVe siècle, focalisée non seulement sur les établissements conventuels et hospitaliers, mais aussi sur la région parisienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".