MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942421120 · doi:10.1177/0896920519842368

Governance and Urban Changes in the Financialized Post-crash Period

2019· article· en· W2942421120 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francisco Quintana

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Sociology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate governanceCrashRecessionCapital (architecture)UrbanizationFinancial crisisCarry (investment)Order (exchange)European unionAsset (computer security)Great recessionPolitical scienceEconomicsEconomic systemEconomyEconomic geographyGeographyEconomic policyFinanceEconomic growthMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we examine the fundamentals of the changes that have taken place in governance and urban spaces after the crisis-recession of 2007–2009, post-crash. In this investigation, we focus on the shifts that have occurred, mainly in the US and the European Union. However, given the existence of global/local asymmetric economic and political interrelations, many of these observations can be extrapolated to other territories, including Canada, Asian countries and Latin America. In particular, these transformations are essential ingredients of the systems of governance and new economic strategies of the Tradable Income-Yielding Asset (TIYA) matrix for the refinancing and structuring of planetary urbanization and, in general, of the processes for accumulation of capital. In order to carry out this analysis, we have divided the text into three parts: 1) governance post-crash; 2) urban spaces and financial recovery; and 3) conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical SociologySame topicHousing, Finance, and NeoliberalismFrench-language works237,207