Flujos de inversión extranjera directa canadiense en México y su incidencia en la competitividad nacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo identificar los factores que se asocian a la atraccion de inversion extranjera directa (IED) canadiense que ingresa a Mexico, y analizar su incidencia sobre la competitividad en Mexico. Para esto, se utilizo la tecnica estadistica de Analisis de Componentes Principales que reduce las variables a menor numero perdiendo la menor cantidad de informacion posible y agruparlas de acuerdo a la relacion que guarden entre ellas, conformando nuevas variables compuestas. Los resultados muestran que durante 1991 – 2011, la IED en Mexico, proveniente de Canada se asocio con el tamano de mercado, la infraestructura, los niveles salariales y la educacion, que de acuerdo al Institute of Managament and Development, son factores de competitividad, y al haber una asociacion positiva, si se incrementan los flujos de IED Canadienses, se coadyuvara a incrementar la competitividad total del pais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".