MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An analysis of quarter-turn valve drive transmission mechanisms

2019· article· en· W2942643723 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V.M. Medunetskiy, V. V. Nikolaev

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurn (biochemistry)Quarter (Canadian coin)Transmission (telecommunications)Mechanism (biology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article addresses problems of optimization of power specifications and efficiency improvement of electric drives for quarter-turn valves. What is proposed is a quad-link transmission mechanism having a variable transmission function matched with the ball valve torque specification. Using the elaborated and proven methodology of comparing technical solutions at the design phase, based on the qualitative-quantitative assessment and analysis of engineering and manufacturing parameters, two alternatives of the transmission mechanism construction were compared. Advantages and disadvantages of the proposed technical solutions are being analyzed. Preferable embodiments of the high-efficiency quarter-turn valve electric drive with the proposed transmission mechanism were determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207