MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W294266326

Brief Analysis on China Rural Tourism/BREVE ANALYSE DU TOURISME RURAL CHINOIS

2007· article· fr· W294266326 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhao Cheng-hua

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismChinaRural tourismEntertainmentTourism geographyPolitical scienceGeographyHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attract: This paper analyzes the strengths and existing problems in the development of China rural tourism, putting forward some main countermeasures in many areas: strengthening layout and industrial management; promoting the cultural taste of rural tourism products and how to improve the construction and management level of this industry. Additionally, it is discussed in which way that exerts the government's roles to push up corporately the development of rural tourism industry and living conditions of local people. Key words: China, Rural tourism, Strengths, problems, countermeasure Resume: L'article present analyse les points forts et les problemes existant dans le developpement du tourisme rural de Chine et propose des contre-mesures dans bien des domaines : le renforcement de l'arrangment et du management industriel, la promotion des produits culturels du tourisme rural et l'amelioration du niveau de construction et de management de cette industrie. En plus, l'auteur discute de quelle maniere le gouvernement joue son role pour favoriser le developpement du tourisme rural et ameliorer les conditions de vie de la population locale. Mots-Cles: Chine, tourisme rural, points forts, problemes, contre-mesure China rural tourism is a kind of new operation of tourism business. Based on folk cultures, gardening sights, farming tourism resources, etc, it provides different tour, leisum, entertainment and shopping services and experiences to urban tourists. According to the contents of this kind of new tourism model, it can be divided into sorts of types, such as rural sighting tourism, rural cultural experience tourism, holidays tourism, leisure tourism and eco-tourism, and so on. China rural tourism has following five operational transactions, including Happy Farmer house tourism near the main cities, visiting high-tech agricultural zones, new agricultural villages, the development of ancient hamlets and finally the brilliant views of farming works. For having very rich natural and ecotourism resources, China should see a rapid and enormous development of her rural areas as long as they can face reasonably this kind of advantages, opportunities, and of course, many challenges. 2. THREE MAJOR STRENGTHS FOR DEVELOPING CHINA RURAL TOURISM Firstly, there are great rich rural tourism resources, natural resources and man-made tourism resources, in such areas. But these precious resources still need to be developed and marketed people or organizations of insight. Secondly, rural cultures are special and unique. In these areas, a tree, a river and even a mountain have its own stories and legends that provide a broad room and bright prospect for the rural tourism development in the future. Thirdly, environmental qualities are quite excellent in these areas. Nowadays, people living in urban cities usually have great stress and pressures on their shoulders, which make them to escape to rural areas to hobnob with the pure natural environment, improve their living qualities and pursuit new living fashions. Rural areas, undoubtedly, have much better water qualities, sound qualities, etc, than that in urban cities. EXISTING PROBLEMS FACED BY THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHINA RURAL TOURISM INDUSTRY. 3.1 Lacking scientific and united layout and management If the tourism layout of rural areas is not well planed from the start, as a result, the negative effects cannot be ignored in the following years. Besides, imperfect legislation system, bad sanitation and environment conditions can restrict the development of China rural tourism to some extents. 3.2 Not having various products forms Existing products are quite alike, in other words, are short of changes. It will discourage tourists' consume, make it more serious for tourism services competition, enlarge the market crisis and low down the profits of their development. 3.3 Absence of characteristics of products 3. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207