Bibliographic record
Abstract
To grasp the argument of Jonathan Israel’s sprawling new book, one hardly needs to read past the title page. Between 1775 and 1848, Americans set the world ablaze, igniting parallel revolutions in Canada, Ireland, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Poland, Cape Town, Haiti, Greece, Venezuela, Argentina, and, eventually, the rest of Spanish America. They did this, Israel maintains, by taking the radical and moderate strands of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment and transforming them into the novel ideology of republicanism. The first people to make this intellectual leap, though hardly the last, Americans created “a new ground-plan for human society,” one that inspired radicals even as it repelled conservatives (8). Although its influence ebbed and flowed, the American Revolution became the “global model” for would-be revolutionaries everywhere (485). Americans occupied this exalted position because the republicanism that they created was in Israel’s telling not one ideology but two. The first was the democratic republicanism of Tom Paine, Benjamin Franklin, and, until he abandoned his radical principles after the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson. Taking their cue from the Pennsylvania constitution of 1776, with its unicameral legislature and universal male adult franchise, democratic republicans opposed slavery, they defended freedom of speech, most favored separation of church and state, some advocated for greater equality between men and women, and a few supported steps to protect the rights of Native Americans and other indigenous peoples. Arrayed against them was the aristocratic republicanism of John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington. Aristocratic republicans were the moderates of the American Revolution. They believed in “mixed government” that would check the worst excesses of the people. They also tended to favor religious establishments, property-based voting qualifications, and protecting the rights of slave owners. The most important exemplar of moderate republicanism was the Federal Constitution of 1787, which had a quasi-monarchical executive, a judiciary whose justices served for life, and a bicameral legislature, the upper chamber of which its Federalist authors envisioned as an aristocratic counterweight to the democratic House of Representatives. It was radicals who gave the American Revolution its global appeal. Ultimately, though, moderates determined how the revolution’s ideals would be put into practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".