Novel orbital seismic sources at a CO2 storage monitoring site, Newell County, Alberta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-lapse seismic surveys are often performed on large time scales and can suffer from repeatability problems arising from variations in source and receiver geometries. Novel orbital seismic sources have been developed and were permanently installed along with a permanent receiver array at a small carbon sequestration site in Newell County, Alberta. Baseline datasets encourage the use of these sources in conjunction with both geophone and fibre optic receivers by confirming the relationship between signal to noise ratio and source effort. Initial testing of the sources indicates promising transfer of the theoretical source signature through the subsurface to surface receivers. Due to the absence of a measurement of the true source signature, pre-processing workflows were developed incorporating pilot trace correlation and Gabor deconvolution. Resultant corridor stacks are comparable to baseline datasets. Testing of surface vibrator sources reveal severe issues with the current source deployment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it