Nuevos miedos en la literatura policial de Chile y Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El elemento fundante del miedo en la narrativa policial adquiere forma acorde a la sociedad aludida. El objeto temido es cambiante porque se refiere a un presente y puede ser identificado tanto en los tópicos narrativos como en la forma en que estos son narrados. Este artículo busca entender la relación entre el éxito editorial que tiene hoy el género policial en dos países del Cono Sur, Argentina y Chile, y los miedos específicos que estos textos sobre crimen señalan. Teniendo como marco teórico los estudios sobre el miedo y siguiendo la idea de Jacques Rancière de que toda política deriva en reflexión estética, se analiza la manera en que escritores chilenos y argentinos (Roberto Bolaño, Mario Valdivia, Josefina Licitra, Mariana Enríquez y Claudia Piñeiro) enmarcan, explican o distribuyen el mundo sensible, mostrando nuevas manifestaciones del miedo comprendido en lo que sería un “realismo capitalista”. En este caso en particular, se trata de un temor producto de la vulnerabilidad generada en un contexto neoliberal cuyo leitmotiv es el consumo y la exclusión.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".