Uterine perivascular adipose tissue: A novel regulator of uterine artery hemodynamics during normal pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction During pregnancy, uterine artery (UtA) blood flow increases compared to non‐pregnant state, in part due to reductions in uterine artery tone. The main objective of this study was to determine the role of adipose tissue surrounding UtA (perivascular adipose tissue, PVAT) in pregnancy‐induced changes in UtA blood flow and vasodilatory capacity. We hypothesized that uterine PVAT augments UtA blood flow and potentiates UtA dilatory responses in pregnant rats. Also, we hypothesized that pregnancy induces distinct changes in uterine PVAT morphology and gene expression as compared to other adipose depots. Methods Blood flow and vascular reactivity were measured in UtA in pregnant and non‐pregnant rats using transonic perivascular probes and wire myography techniques, respectively. Reactivity to acetylcholine (ACh: induces endothelium‐dependent relaxation, 10 −9 – 3×10 −5 M) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP: induces endothelium‐independent relaxation, 10 −11 – 3×10 −5 M) was measured in isolated UtA in the presence and absence of PVAT‐conditioned media (PVAT media , 30‐min incubation). Adipocyte size was determined in hematoxylin and eosin‐stained sections of uterine PVAT and ovarian adipose tissue. Gene expression was determined in uterine and periaortic PVAT using qRT‐PCR. Results Maximum and minimum uterine artery blood flow (UBF) were increased in UtA with intact PVAT compared to PVAT‐denuded UtA from pregnant rats (UBF max (mL/min); denuded: 1.47 ± 0.3 vs. intact: 2.23 ± 0.2, p = 0.01; UBF min (mL/min); denuded: 0.71 ± 0.1 vs. intact: 1.16 ± 0.1, p = 0.0002). Uterine PVAT had no effect on UBF in non‐pregnant rats (p>0.9). UtA from pregnant and non‐pregnant rats incubated with PVAT media had reduced sensitivity to ACh compared to UtA controls [Pregnant, p EC 50 ; −PVAT media : 7.14 ± 0.1 vs. +PVAT media : 6.38 ± 0.2, p = 0.0006; Non‐pregnant, p EC 50 ; −PVAT media : 7.01 ± 0.1 vs. +PVAT media : 6.50 ± 0.1, p = 0.005). PVAT media had no effect on UtA sensitivity to SNP in either pregnant (p=0.48) or non‐pregnant rats (p = 0.2). Adipocyte area was greater in ovarian adipose tissue from pregnant compared to nonpregnant rats (Area (μm 2 /unit cell); Non‐pregnant: 563.6 ± 76.6 vs. Pregnant: 857.6 ± 31.0, p = 0.02) but there were no group differences in uterine PVAT morphology (p = 0.6). Expression of uncoupling protein‐1 (UCP‐1) was downregulated (p = 0.02) in aortic PVAT but was unchanged in uterine PVAT (p = 0.4). Expression of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma ( PPAR‐γ) , adiponectin receptor (AdipoR1) , and leptin were downregulated in uterine PVAT (p ≤ 0.02) but not in aortic PVAT (p ≥ 0.6). Conclusions Uterine PVAT plays a regulatory role in uterine artery hemodynamics and reactivity during normal pregnancy and has a distinct and differential gene profile as compared to other perivascular depots. Ongoing studies investigate the effects of pregnancy on cross‐talk between PVAT and maternal uterine arteries. Support or Funding Information University of North Texas Health Science Center Pilot Grant This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".