MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942819756 · doi:10.7202/1067263ar

À propos de certaines implications juridiques du Brexit dans le domaine de la lutte contre les changements climatiques

2020· article· fr· W2942819756 on OpenAlex
Géraud de Lassus Saint-Geniès

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Geoengineering
Canadian institutionsSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesForestryGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Brexit n’est pas un sujet que l’on associe d’ordinaire aux changements climatiques. Pourtant, comme la politique climatique du Royaume-Uni est étroitement imbriquée avec celle de l’Union européenne, la perspective du Brexit fait aussi apparaître dans ce domaine particulier un ensemble de questions juridiques. Par exemple, les traités sur le climat étant des accords mixtes, le Royaume-Uni y sera-t-il encore partie une fois sorti de l’Union européenne? Qu’adviendra-t-il des engagements qu’il a pris conjointement avec l’Union dans le cadre de ces traités? Au sein de quel groupe de négociation prendra-t-il part aux discussions onusiennes sur le climat ? Et continuera-t-il de participer au marché du carbone européen? L’objectif de cet article consiste à apporter des éléments de réponse à ces différentes questions et à mettre en lumière la complexité des enjeux juridiques que le Brexit soulève dans le domaine du droit des changements climatiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it